![]() ![]() The only time it really gets brought up is the kids sneaking off, and that iirc was addressed as to not being prepared for people to sneak outside the safe zone and focused only on what or who may come in. It was the lack of security and the bunker entrances being rather fragile, cramped, and unmonitored allowed panic to boil over and infected to get inside.Īnd I think largely the film falls apart a bit from something good to serviceable, since there feels like there was a lack of focus on the presentation of security falling apart. There being no incubation period with the brain succumbing in 10-20 seconds, and the first movie showed that the infected were attracted to/were intelligently drawn by light, made the bunker plan relatively viable. so that it doesn't feel like they've been 1-upped since they made Weeks. ![]() I think nowadays though we've seen SO MANY zombie movies that they have their work cut out for them coming up with a unique premise and setup etc. Just seemed like hamfisted plot devices.Īs harsh as I sound like I'm being I enjoyed it quite a bit and don't think it's as bad as it's reputation. There wasn't enough there that convinced me that everyone had become complacent and it was the reason for the collapse of the city. Just broke the illusion of the whole basic premise to me and I would have almost rather they have some kind of magic macguffin virus variant as the trigger for the outbreak etc. To me it just seemed like "there's no way this city was able to become the quarantine zone and reach this kind of stability but ALSO make so many bad moves and decisions and fuck ups we see happening in this film." And then I didn't enjoy the overly long escape segment of the film.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |